|
Institution:
|
Shawnee State
University |
|
Submitted:
|
2005-12-19 |
|
|
Timeline:
|
|
Planned project
kickoff date: January 9, 2006
Target completion date: June 1, 2008
Actual completion date: |
|
A. Give this Action
Project a short title in 10 words or fewer: |
|
Improve Student
Advising |
|
B. Describe this
Action Project's goal in 100 words or fewer: |
|
This project will
address the needs of SSU students, particularly “at-risk”
students, through improved advising procedures, structures
and training. The student advising action project will build
on advising changes and improvements achieved during a Title
III grant at Shawnee during the past three years. The work
with incoming and current students will expand into an
advising system that serves all students and results in
improved retention and persistence to graduation. One
possible structural change, such as the creation of a
University College, has been much discussed on campus. This
project will include planning for such a structural change. |
|
C. Identify the
single AQIP Category which the Action Project will most
affect or impact: |
|
Category 3:
Understanding Students’ and Other Shareholders’ Needs |
|
D. Describe briefly
your institution's reasons for taking on this Action Project
now -- why the project and its goals are high among your
current priorities: |
|
Shawnee State
University is an open admissions institution that serves an
Appalachian region where many students are first-generation
college attendees. The recently concluded Title III project
addressed the challenge of serving “at-risk” students.
Freshman to sophomore retention has improved (need number
here), but still remains low when compared with other Ohio
public institutions. Improved advising of entering as well
as advanced students is seen by faculty and staff as an
important element in increasing retention and keeping
students on track to graduation.
Advising was in the top five opportunity areas that emerged
from the Vital Focus Survey and eight action project
ideas were put forth from Shawnee’s Conversation Day.
There is a recognition that there are different student
audiences (initial advising, freshman advising, undecided
student advising, semester-conversion advising, major
advising, etc.) for advising and that coordination can
improve among the different staff groups responsible for the
different types of advising. |
|
E. List the
organizational areas - -institutional departments, programs,
divisions, or units -- most affected by or involved in this
Action Project: |
|
Advising functions
are currently housed under both the Vice-President for
Academic Affairs (two colleges and academic departments) and
the Vice-President for Student Affairs (Student Success
Center, TRIO programs, and various student affairs
offices). Some student advising related to financial
assistance, grants and scholarships is done by the Financial
Aid Office under the Vice-President for Business Affairs.
Because advising impacts all employee groups at Shawnee, the
various governance groups at the institution (University
Faculty Senate, University Administrative Assembly, and
University Staff Assembly) will be involved in the Action
Project. In addition, advising is addressed in the contract
with the faculty bargaining unit, so the Shawnee Education
Association will be involved in this project.
The groups most
affected by this project will be the College of Arts and
Sciences and its six departments; the College of
Professional Studies and its three departments; and the
Student Success Center. Other offices on campus such as
Admissions and Financial Aid may be indirectly affected by
the Advising Action Project. |
|
F. Name and describe
briefly the key organizational process(es) that you expect
this Action Project to change or improve: |
|
Advising is a key
organizational process that will be changed and improved
through this Action Project. Other processes such as
registration, new student orientation, and mathematics and
English placement may also be affected. |
|
G. Explain the
rationale for the length of time planned for this Action
Project (from kickoff to target completion): |
|
Shawnee State
University is transitioning from a quarter calendar to a
semester calendar. The semester calendar will begin in the
fall of 2007. This project will be in place during the
switch to semesters and beyond to assure the implementation
of new procedures and structures and the collection and
analysis of data regarding the impact of the project. |
|
H. Describe how you
plan to monitor how successfully your efforts on this Action
Project are progressing: |
|
An Action Project
Team of 6-8 members will be formed to provide the detailed
planning, implementation, and assessment of the Advising
Action Project. The university’s Strategic Planning
Committee will provide an oversight and coordination role
with the Action Projects. Administrative responsibility for
monitoring and assisting the Action Project progress will be
with the Associate Provost/Director of Institutional
Planning. |
|
I. Describe the
overall "outcome" measures or indicators that will tell you
whether this Action Project has been a success or failure in
achieving its goals: |
- The
overall goal of this project is increased student
retention and improved persistence until graduation. Both
of these measures will be used to determine the success of
this project.
- Student
satisfaction surveys (Noel-Levitz) and staff surveys (Vital
Focus) have given data on perceptions about advising.
Future surveys of students and employees will be used to
measure changes in satisfaction with advising.
- Other
possible outcome measures that will be considered are
indirect measures of advising success such as fewer course
deficiencies or course waivers at graduation, loss of
students because of the transition to semesters, increased
visits by students to faculty during office hours, etc.
|
|
J. Other information
(e.g., publicity, sponsor or champion, etc.): |
|
An institutional
concern and need identified during the Vital Focus
and Conversation Day was improved communication on campus.
This project will consciously model good communications by
regularly informing the campus community about progress
through multiple communication approaches including, web
postings, emails, newsletters, and reports to governance
groups (faculty, administrators, staff and students). The
project will also seek input from campus groups by a variety
of means that may include surveys, focus groups, meetings
with key individuals, open meetings, and requests for
information. |